The Prayer of Jabez experience.

Badly needing a new job, in addition to hitting the want ads, I decided to fire up my Prayer of Jabez DVD. Early on they suggested writing a ‘Prayer of Jabez’ journal. I can write, so I thought I would do that.
The good news is I have a new job and I got it exactly one month after starting the DVD journal. The bad news is it’s still a temp job and possibly very short term, but one day at a time.
My personal experience with the Prayer of Jabez is that it works…kind of… I’ve always found it helpful, just not very helpful. Other people seem to get a lot better results with this.
Don’t get me wrong, I have a lot to be thankful for. I thank God every day that I live in the USA , for example. I’m very grateful for the help in getting this current job. Still I can’t help feeling like a character in a 1930’s serial around chapter ten. Thank God I’ve escaped from certain death…again…for the tenth week in a row…yea, this is…great… It does beat the alternative, but could I have a word with the writer about NEXT weeks episode?!?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Fairy folk as scientific outliers

Outliers are strange data points. If you take a survey of how tall everyone is in your office, and you get a report that someone is twelve feet tall. That’s an outlier. Probably it’s a bad data, someone wrote down Fred is 72” tall and it looked like 12′ tall after coffee got poured over the paper. But good science says that we have a glance at Fred to see if he really is twelve feet tall before you toss out that data. Or as it says in the Wikipedia section on outliers: “Unless it can be ascertained that the deviation is not significant, it is ill-advised to ignore the presence of outliers. Outliers that cannot be readily explained demand special attention.”
So what if, instead of talking about how tall everyone is in our office, lets talk about what critters we see in the neighborhood. Lets see, dog, cat, cow, Bigfoot….Bigfoot?!? Yep we have outliers in the field of biology. They are called Cryptids. Some of these pan out, like Black Swans which were once thought not to exist.
So what about elves? What’s interesting about Elves is that just like Bigfoot or the Loch Ness Monster, people claim to have seen Elves. The reports are rare, definitely scientific outliers, and frankly some of them, like the famous photos that A. Conan Doyle pushed, are extremely questionable.
So, are there really faeries, dragons, dwarfs or mermaids out there? Probably not, but you don’t ignore outlying reports. You want to keep an eye on them. After all if it turns out that really was a mermaid dancing off the Coast of Israel recently, that’s important news.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Are there morality lessons in the Iliad?

Last night I was challenged with the question “Are there morality lessons in the Iliad?” The short answer is yes. The book is actually so thick with morality lessons, it’s hard to discern them all.

This book can be a little confusing for the modern audience. It isn’t, as some people expect, a fairy tale. This is actually a history book. It’s not written in the style of modern histories, we don’t after all, talk of the Archangel Gabriel standing beside the Rangers as they made their charge up Pointe du Hoc. But that is just the way things were written back then. It has been well demonstrated that you can follow the history of the actual historic battle by reading Homer, if you understand his writing style. Understanding that it is a history explains why there are some boring lists in the book of who killed who and exactly what ships showed up. You will also note this is not the near mythical Achilles with invulnerable skin who takes the battlefield. That was a later creation of the poets. No this Achilles is an actual man. The over all plot structure is not dictated by the needs of fiction, but by historic events.

I should also note that the Iliad is not the story of “The Trojan War.” It’s a story of a battle during the Trojan War. It’s more like reading about D-Day, than World War II.

Nevertheless there are plenty of morality lessons to be found. You look for them in the actions and speeches of the individual characters. It helps to have a bit of a list in front of you before you dive in, so that you know when Nestor opens his mouth you’re going to hear the voice of wisdom and experience speaking.

As an example, here’s a random bit of wisdom from the opening scene of the Iliad. What answer does Achilles give his King, when the King tries to order his subjects about without properly consulting them. (Read in your favorite modern politician demanding that someone do such and such). “I should be a mean coward,” he cried, “were I to give into you in all things. Order other people about, not me…”

My favorite example of buried wisdom in the Iliad is Achilles commenting on socialism. Over three thousand years ago, the ancient Greeks also faced the question of whether it was better to ‘spread the wealth around’ or should they give unique rewards for exceptional accomplishment? In refusing to fight any more for the Greeks, he says: “I see I have no thanks for all my fighting. He that fights fares no better than he that does not. Coward and hero are held in equal honor, and death deals like measure to him who works and him who is idle.” Something to think about. If you spread the wealth around too much, don’t expect your great heroes to exert themselves on your behalf. This is why Communism fails. The Greeks knew it in about 1250 B.C. Who says there are no morality lessons in the Iliad?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Fred Weasley…not so fast

I assume everyone who cares has seen or read Harry Potter 7.2 by now so it’s safe to comment. Not everyone was happy with the death of Fred Weasley. For those of you who are unhappy, I’d just like to introduce you to a technique we writers call “writing the next scene.” Here are some possible lines for following opening scene for Harry Potter 8:

Harry: “Fred! You’re alive?! How is that possible?! They saw you die! No magic can bring anyone back from the dead.

Fred’s line (Pick one)
1) Until now! Eureka!
2) You saw what Voldermort wanted you to see.
3) Perhaps you’ve heard of Polyjuice potion?
4) I was mostly dead, yes.
5) Sorry to deceive you but it was important.
6) Clones Harry, I’m afraid there is one of you as well.
7) I see no one told you about my evil triplicate.
8.) Clever of Professor McGonagall to transform that death eaters body into a copy of my own.
9) The Grail, Harry, it’s power is beyond any magic. We’ve got to get it back.
10) Thank goodness you had the resurrection stone with you Harry, you see there is a way it can work.
I think my favorite is number one, but pick your own and run with it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Bible and Usury

I was asked to comment on usuary, and as my explination is a bit long winded this is as good a place as any. Here goes.
Generally speaking, if you do a bit of research the stranger rules that were laid down in Leviticus all had some sort of logical purpose and reason at the time. My favorite is the prohibition against inter-cropping, i.e. growing two plants together. The Land experimental farm in Epcot center is literally filled with inter-cropping experiments, designed to save people from poverty and starvation by cross breeding plants and growing one or more crops together in the same patch of land. All this is technically prohibited by Leviticus, as is my Pastor’s favorite the rule against clothing with more than one type of cloth. He noted one Sunday that if was going to literally obey those rules he was going to have to throw out his church robes, since they were some sort of modern fabric blend.
At the time they were written, these rules did make sense. Inter-cropping with the plants available at the time was a poor farming practice. But unlike the major rules in the Ten Commandments, some of these lesser rules really don’t make much sense when extended beyond the time and region they were enacted. The most obvious example of this is the rule against eating pigs. I read a paper one time noting that Pigs in ancient Israel were a very poor food source because in Ancient Israel they ate the same foods that humans did. This isn’t the case on the other side of the planet. Where feral pigs are quite common, easy to raise and an efficient food source. This particular rule was in fact specifically repealed.
Acts 15: 1-29 frees us from all this, but even before that, you will note that Jesus never rewarded anyone for obeying the letter of the law and not the spirit. e.g. Matt 15 1-10, and Matt 16:11. Not everything is out. Obviously the ten commandments still apply. No one said you can murder anyone. So how do you know what is in and what’s out? A little common sense works wonders here. Note Jesus’ initial answer to man in Mark 10:19. You know the commandments, it’s not that complicated. Scholars have tied most of the rules of Leviticus back to the commandments. e.g. magic is out because the classical power source for magic is demons or in other words other Gods. If you are talking about card tricks or modern pharmacy, that doesn’t apply. Incest? You know darn well all forms of sexual immorality are against the rules.
So what about Usury?
If you look at the sort of financial transactions going on at the time, you can make a good case that the charging of interest as practiced at that time and place is an immoral practice. Money lenders are charging very high interest rates for necessities. Think share cropping in the post civil war era. “I owe my soul to the company store” and all that.
Common sense would indicate there is a big difference between this sort of practice and the modern commercial loan. e.g. I want to buy a widget machine, but I can’t afford one. If I have one I can make a 10% return on my investment. I’m willing and happy to pay a bank 5% for a commercial loan, so I can make 5% on my money. The bank in turn pays savers 2% on their savings accounts for the privilege of using their money to make commercial loans. Everyone benefits from this system. I f you think about it, it has more in common with a partnership agreement than it does a loan shark. A lot of what modern financial institutions ( like corporations) so is manage risk and facilitate rather complex partnership arrangements.
Lets remember that Leviticus dates back to about 1500 BC, give or take a few hundred years. A lot of our modern insurance and corporation rules date back to Rhodian sea law. Rhodes had not even build the Colossus of Rhodes at the time Leviticus was written. It will be a thousand years or so before Rhodes really gets going, so again I think we can logically distinguish between Biblical usury and modern banking.
Seeing what banks charge for credit cards these days, it’s probably best that Leviticus did say something about usury. It’s an important warning to all of us that charging excessive interest can be a means of oppression. But I don’t think a clear reading of the Bible supports the notion that no one may ever charge interest on a loan at any time, for any reason.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Welcome Spammers

I hesitate to say anything bad about spammers as so far they are my biggest fans. Nevertheless too much of a good thing can be tiresome, so I’ve implimented some new security features. Appologies to those few humans who have visited here for the inconvienence.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ancient enemies

I’m forever reading in fantasy books about some Ancient enemie returning from thousands of years ago and everyone is surprised and disapointed that no one is ready for them. Really? Thousands of years? You are suprised? What do we have now that’s over a thousand years
old? England? The Vatican?

Now there might be a story if the Nephilim returned. Of course a 12 foot giant might have a bit of trouble with an M1 tank.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Should we make up our own Gods?

In modern fantasy novels it’s very common for the author to make up their own deities. It is a tradition better honored in the breach than the observance. I don’t say it’s never appropriate, if you are writing about Ancient Atlantis or some place like that it’s logical to assume they would have some crazy pantheon of their own. But even in these cases there is too little use of the model Tolkien and C.S. Lewis used, i.e. giving new to the Christian Pantheon. I prefer to follow the model of the tales of Arthur and Charlemagne where we uphold Jesus as the true defender against the darkness. It’s something we need to be reminded of in this world which so often tries to deny that there is anything dark about the dark. In a world where it’s common to talk about killing fetal babies to make potions to prolong our lives, can we continue to deny the existence of black magic?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ultimate Goblins

I watched a couple of episodes of the Ultimate Warrior recently. A good example of how ‘experts’ can get it wrong. They did an amazing job analyzing the factors they looked at. Unfortunately they ignored obvious vital information that made their conclusions laughable. e.g. experts conclude the Comanche is a better warrior than the Mongol, ignoring the fact the Mongol bow has nearly double the range of the Comanche weapon. A worse example was concluding the Indian long sword was better than the Roman short sword. They ignored the fact that the Roman weapon is designed to be used in tight packed formations. Historically the Roman Legions obliterated troops using long cutting swords. Great example of asking the wrong questions leading to getting the wrong answers.

Which isn’t to say there wasn’t some very interesting data in that show. I like the Comanche ax for a Goblin weapon. Cheap, and effective, a poor raiders weapon. Perfect for goblins.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Poll #2 Swordfish or Martin T4M?

I have an idea for a story with a 1930 ish Carrier. The Carrier is a small one, about 9.000 Tons about 30 aircraft. So that would be 12 Boeing F4B’s, 8 Curtiss F8/02C’s and 8…hmm. Well the logical US plane is the Martin T4M, but it’s kind of an ugly plane if you ask me. I’m tempted to use the Fairly Swordfish instead. Ok that’s out of period, slightly. It’s a 1936 plane, not a 1929 plane. But the stats really aren’t bad for a 1929 plane. The Swordfish wasn’t exaclty the plane of the future when they made it. Dunno would it really be so bad to swap in the Swordfish for the Martin? Any Martin T4M fans out there?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment